Fig. 8 shows Arrhenius plots of bul

图8示出了从电模量（M00）的虚部的光谱图获得的本体电导率数据的阿伦尼乌斯图，其将冷烧结的<br>0.1BF12-0.9LMO复合材料与常规烧结的BF12和常规烧结的LMO进行了比较。不出所料，与LMO相比，BF12陶瓷具有更高的体导电率。电导率<br>与端部构件相比，复合陶瓷的数量级在中间。与从数据中提取的整体响应相关的活化能值表明，冷烧结的0.1BF12-0.9LMO的活化能为0.25 eV，与导电性更高的端部构件（BF12）的0.29 eV相当，并且远低于1.28 eV与常规烧结的LMO相关。这些数据表明，复合材料中存在渗透路径，电流通过较高的导电BF12相选择电阻最小的路径。

Fig. 8 shows Arrhenius plots of bulk conductivity data obtained from spectroscopic plots of the imaginary components of the electric modulus (M00) which compare cold sintered 0.1BF12-<br>0.9LMO composites with, conventionally sintered BF12 and conventionally sintered LMO. As expected, the BF12 ceramic has much higher bulk conductivity compared to LMO. The conductivity<br>of the composite ceramics is intermediate in magnitude compared to the end members. The values of activation energy associated with the bulk response extracted from the data reveal that cold sintered 0.1BF12-0.9LMO has an activation energy of 0.25 eV which is comparable to 0.29 eV of the more conductive end member (BF12) and is much lower than 1.28 eV associated with conventionally sintered LMO. These data suggest that a percolation pathway exists in the composite with the current choosing the path of least resistance via the higher conducting BF12 phase.

图8示出了从比较冷烧结0.1BF12的电模量（M00）虚部分量的光谱图中获得的体电导数据的Arrhenius图-<br>0.9LMO复合材料，常规烧结BF12和常规烧结LMO。如所料，与LMO相比，BF12陶瓷具有更高的体电导。电导率<br>与端部构件相比，复合陶瓷的数量中等。从数据中提取的体响应相关活化能值显示，冷烧结0.1BF12-0.9LMO的活化能为0.25ev，与导电性更强的端部构件（BF12）的0.29ev相当，远低于与传统烧结LMO相关的1.28ev。这些数据表明，复合材料中存在一个渗流路径，电流通过高导电的BF12相选择电阻最小的路径。<br>